When We Disagree, by Gary Coffee

When conflict arises in a family, we all know that avoiding it is not a helpful conflict management strategy. In the same way, when there is conflict in the family of God, it is much better to talk about it than it is to avoid it. Certainly, issues of sexuality have caused conflict in the family of our Episcopal Church. Rather than avoiding the discussion, is it possible that the love of Christ is strong enough and compelling enough to more than hold us together when we experience conflict? We know that it is.

In I Corinthians chapter 5:14, St. Paul writes, “The love of Christ urges us on, because we are convinced that one has died for all; therefore all have died.” The love of Christ which indwells every one of us “urges us on.” This love keeps us from holding back when we need to be working together. It urges us on to find, to acknowledge and to preserve the unity that we have in Christ Jesus.

In thinking about this, I was reminded of the many “one another” references in The New Testament. We are called to “love one another with mutual affection; to outdo one another in showing honour.” (Rom. 12:10) We sing that renewal song, “They Will Know We Are Christians By Our Love.” We sing it, but is it so? Will we decide to love one another with mutual affection even when we disagree? Can we possibly outdo one another in showing honor when you think one way about an issue and I think another? With God’s help, we can.

In I Corinthians 12, St. Paul reminds us that we are all parts of the body of Christ. Using the analogy of a human body, he talks about how one part of the body cannot reject another part. He writes, “The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you,’ nor again the head to the feet, ‘I have no need of you.’” We don’t reject family members because we disagree with them. Neither can we reject each other in the Body of Christ when we disagree. Rather, as aggravating as it may be, we are called to “Bear with one another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other; just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive.” (Col. 3:13) St. Paul goes on to say, “Above all, clothe yourselves with love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony. And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in the one body.” (Col. 3:14-15)

“Clothe yourselves with love.” When you and I are clothed with love, we are in synch with Christ in such a way that we tend to lay down our weapons. When we’ve laid down our weapons, then we can try and understand where persons are coming from whose understanding of God differs from ours.

Don't Panic, by Rick Lawler

So what would help us in our discussion of human sexuality as a Church? I’m assuming we all love God and seek God’s will. Something along those lines is the beginning. But it is clear well-meaning committed people can come to mutually exclusive conclusions regarding God’s will.

Gregory of Nanzianzus

So the next step is knowing ourselves and being true to ourselves. What has God said to us through scripture and experience? What has God revealed to us through our prayer and relationships? I think we need to be true to that whether it places us on the left, right, middle, or all of the above. We must speak our truth without fear. If we’re convinced God’s will is for the full acceptance and inclusion of Gay folks in the Church we need to live out that truth. If we’re convinced the Bible reveals gay people as somehow living an inherently sinful life we need to live out the implications of that truth. We must speak that truth without fear.

The questions that then arise are:

• Can we agree to disagree?
• Can we love our opposite-minded brothers and sisters and accept they have different perceptions of truth?
• Can we work together to follow and serve Christ in honest debate where necessary and dialogue where possible?
• Or is it time for some of us to leave?
• Or all the above?

I guess I don’t see the present issues as anything unusual for the Church. The Church has always struggled to articulate the faith. The Church has always had lots of different answers to essential questions. We’ve sometimes been able to stay together and sometimes had to let go and strike out in a different direction from our brothers and sisters. The mystery of the Church will survive, even if the particular form of the Church we have known changes, even dramatically.

I remember reading somewhere the idea that Gregory of Nazianzus with his fourth century eyes would have found the twelfth century Church of Francis of Assissi in some ways incomprehensible. Francis would likewise struggle with many aspects of Luther’s sixteenth century Church who would not know what to do with twenty-first century Christians. (Did I get those centuries even close?) But the point is we’re always changing and we need not panic because of the changes we are struggling with.

Maybe that’s my real sense of the way forward. First, don’t panic! Trust God to be with us all, through it all, in it all. Trust the Spirit to lead us even if we’re lead in different directions. How enormous that early split between Paul and the Jerusalem Christians must have felt. One branch died and another flourished. But does anything ever really die? Isn’t every death a seed going down into the ground to be raised by God into something else? So this is my thought. There’s nothing to be afraid of, don’t panic.

"For the Bible Tells Me So" --reviewed by Pattie Curtis

“Last week, I bought the gun. Yesterday, I wrote the note. Last night I saw your story on PBS and knowing that someday, somewhere, I might be able to go back into a church with my head held high. I dropped the gun in the river...”

When he read those words in the short email from a young gay man, PBS producer Dan Karslake, realized that he needed to create a film to “get the word out that God doesn’t hate gay and lesbian people; in fact, God loves them.” The result is For the Bible Tells Me So, a documentary film that explores the experiences of five families as they struggle to reconcile their Christian faith and accept their gay or lesbian children.

These five stories are told with tenderness and compassion. Deftly woven throughout are thoughtful commentaries by theologians on the historical teachings of the Church about homosexuality. As each family struggles to understand the references in the Bible that have long driven the conversation in the Church about homosexuality, the viewer is drawn in to their personal and powerful stories. This is a film about the overwhelming power of love to transform.

I had the privilege of meeting Dan Karslake as he was making this documentary. Throughout its production, Dan’s goal was to make a film that would move the discussion of religion and homosexuality beyond the polarizing and often stereotypical language which is too often used and has only the effect of diminishing any productive conversation. In this deeply moving film, he has succeeded. He has added a needed voice to the discussion of the place of homosexuality in the church.

The poignant stories told in this film draw the discussion of homosexuality from the abstract to the personal and concrete, giving faces and names to those who find themselves and their families caught in the ongoing debate and struggle within the church. These personal stories make this film a useful tool for any group wishing to have a meaningful and truthful conversation about the place of homosexuality in the church.

The Rev. Patricia Harris Curtis, Rector
St. John’s Episcopal Church
18 Jackson Street
Sylva, North Carolina 28779

A Copy of this film will be given to each parish choosing to use it in their own listening process.

Parish Dialogue, by Rob Field

Mosaic from Montecassino Abbey

When I came to St. Philip’s 10 years ago as rector, I quickly learned that we are a microcosm of the Episcopal Church as a whole. As I’m quick to remind folks here, the full spectrum of viewpoints is represented under our one roof.

This means that, after General Convention 2003 and the controversy over The Right Rev. Gene Robinson’s confirmation as Bishop of New Hampshire, we had a fairly urgent need for dialogue about “the issues.” My conviction was that we needed a structured forum of some sort, a safe place for self-described “traditionalists,” “progressives” and “centrists” to share with each other their beliefs about human sexuality and – perhaps – how they acquired them. After some anxious hand-wringing, I decided to organize a six-week event to promote this kind of dialogue.

Looking back, I can name a few things which I would do again under similar circumstances. I identified two men and two women in the parish I considered “bridge people” – folks with a track record of being slow to take sides or grind axes. They became the facilitators of the small groups, which were a central component of the dialogue. Then, I began to assemble articles, audio programs and videos which represented different sides of the issue. For every good argument made by a traditionalist, I looked for a counter-argument by a progressive and, if possible, a centrist. One of the best resources was a video curriculum produced by the Diocese of Atlanta. I don’t remember the title, but I do recall that it featured John Westerhoff. Of course, we had the usual ground rules for the small group discussions: speak only for yourself from personal experience, respect all members of the group, etc.

I was gratified that, at the end of the forum, the evaluations were uniformly positive. They indicated that a significant number of people had grown in their understanding of other people’s perspectives as well as their own. And, in the end, that’s exactly what I’d hoped our dialogue would accomplish. --The Rev. Rob Field

HOB Statement concerning Lambeth

ENS:
The House of Bishops, during its business session on Wednesday afternoon, March 12, at the Camp Allen Conference Center, Navosta, Texas, approved a statement concerning the upcoming Lambeth Conference.

Give to your Church, O God,
a bold vision and a daring charity,
a refreshed wisdom and a courteous understanding,
that the eternal message of your Son
may be acclaimed as the good news of the age;
through him who makes all things new,
even Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. (1)

We, the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church, approaching the forthcoming Lambeth Conference, are mindful of the hurt that is being experienced by so many in our own Episcopal Church, in other Provinces of our global communion, and in the world around us. While the focus of this hurt seems centered on issues of human sexuality, beneath it we believe there is a feeling of marginalization by people of differing points of view. Entering into Holy Week, our response is to name this hurt and to claim our hope that is in Christ. As the Lambeth Conference approaches, we believe we have an enormous opportunity, in the midst of struggle, to be proud of our heritage, and to use this particular time in a holy way by affirming our rich diversity. The health of such diversity is that we are dealing openly with issues that affect the entire global community. Thus, even as we acknowledge the pain felt by many, we also affirm its holiness as we seek to be faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Even though we did not all support the consecration of the Bishop of New Hampshire, we acknowledge that he is a canonically elected and consecrated bishop in this church. We regret that he alone among bishops ministering within the territorial boundaries of their dioceses and provinces, did not receive an invitation to attend the Lambeth Conference.

We appeal to the faithful of the Episcopal Church and the faithful in the wider, global Anglican family, to focus and celebrate our unity in the comprehensiveness of diversity. In union with Christian tradition through the centuries, we are willing to face challenges that precipitate struggle as a means towards reconciliation.

During our meeting we have been praying for a "daring charity and courteous understanding." With this intent and guided by the Holy Spirit, we go to the Lambeth Conference spiritually united and praying that God will sanctify our struggles and unify us for Christ's mission to a hurting world.

(1) This Franciscan-inspired prayer was offered by our chaplains during this meeting of the House of Bishops.

Human Sexuality: Recent History of Conversation

WHERE DO WE STAND? – A Background Paper on Gay & Lesbian Inclusion in the Episcopal Church (Compiled by Susan Russell; updated 10/05)

SOME HISTORY: The Episcopal Church has been officially debating the issue of human sexuality, particularly as it applies to gay and lesbian people, since the General Convention of 1976 when resolutions passed by the Bishops and Deputies began to frame the parameters of the debate. In the intervening years resolutions have been passed and then amended as the church's position has evolved in response to the dialogue. In 1976, the General Convention asserted in a resolution that "homosexual persons are children of God who have a full and equal claim with all other persons upon the love, acceptance and pastoral concern and care of the Church." But there continues to be a wide divergence of opinion on just how we live out that understanding in the Church.

In 1991, at the General Convention held in Phoenix acknowledged its inability to resolve the complex issues surrounding human sexuality by means of the normal legislative process. The Convention opted instead for a process of continued study and dialogue across the whole church, with a report to be issued from the House of Bishops. That report, “Continuing the Dialogue,” was published in 1994 and is highly recommended as a resource for more detailed information.

While resolutions from General Convention are important aspects of our polity - the process through which we govern the church - they are generally perceived to be recommendatory and therefore lacking the force of a canon or law. The only canon to deal with the issue of homosexual orientation in any specific way was adopted in 1994:

"All Bishops of Dioceses and other Clergy shall make provisions to identify fit persons for Holy Orders and encourage them to present themselves for Postulancy. No one shall be denied access to the selection process for ordination in this Church because of race, color, ethnic origin, sex, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, disabilities, or age, except as otherwise specified by these Canons." -- Title III, Canon 4, Section 1 of the Constitution and Canons for the Government of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America, p. 60

In 1996, the Court of Trial for a Bishop refused to hear charges filed against Bishop Walter Righter for ordaining a gay man living in a relationship. The court said there was no doctrine against such an ordination and that there is no canonical bar to gay and lesbian ordination in the Episcopal Church.

ACTIONS OF RECENT GENERAL CONVENTIONS

In 1997, the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, meeting in Philadelphia, APPROVED HEALTH BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS, to be extended to the partners of clergy and lay employees in dioceses that wish to do so. It also voted to APOLOGIZE ON BEHALF OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH to its members who are gay and lesbian and to the lesbians and gay men outside the Church for years of rejection and maltreatment by the Church and affirm that this Church seeks amendment of our life together as we ask God's help in sharing the Good News with all people.

Meeting in Denver in 2000, General Convention approved the following resolutions: The IDENTIFICATION OF “SAFE SPACES” (A009), establishing a formal process for congregations to identify themselves as safe spaces for GLBT people; urging congregational CONVERSATION WITH YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS ABOUT SEXUALITY (A046); promoting DIALOGUE ON FIDELITY IN HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS (A080); and recommending that congregations engage in dialogue with the BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA REGARDING THEIR POLICY ON HOMOSEXUALS (C031).

Arguably the most influential resolution adopted in Denver was D039 “Human Sexuality: Issues Related to Sexuality and Relationships.” Passed overwhelmingly by a voice vote in the House of Deputies and by a 119-19 margin in the House of Bishops. An “8th Resolve” which called for the preparation of rites for inclusion in the Book of Occasional Services failed to pass by a narrow margin in both houses. However, this important resolution broke new ground by moving the Episcopal Church into conversations about relationship that transcend sexual orientation ... and set the stage for the 2003 General Convention in Minneapolis.

GENERAL CONVENTION 2003

What exactly was approved at General Convention 2003 regarding the Blessings of Relationships?

Resolution C051 – (* FINAL VERSION – Concurred)

Topic/Title: Rites: Blessing of Committed Same-Gender Relationships

Proposer: Diocese of Michigan

---

Resolved, the House of Deputies concurring, That the 74^th General Convention affirms the following:

1. That our life together as a community of faith is grounded in the saving work of Jesus Christ and expressed in the principles of the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral: Holy Scripture, the historic Creeds of the Church, the two dominical sacraments, and the historic episcopate.
2. That we reaffirm Resolution A069 of the 65^th General Convention (1976) that “homosexual persons are children of God who have a full and equal claim with all other persons upon the love, acceptance, and pastoral concern and care of the Church”.
3. That, in our understanding of homosexual persons, differences exist among us about how best to care pastorally for those who intend to live in monogamous, non-celibate unions; and what is, or should be, required, permitted, or prohibited by the doctrine, discipline, and worship of The Episcopal Church concerning the blessing of the same.
4. That we reaffirm Resolution D039 of the 73^rd General Convention (2000), that “We expect such relationships will be characterized by fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and respect, careful, honest communication, and the holy love which enables those in such relationships to see in each other the image of God”, and that such relationships exist throughout the church.
5. That, we recognize that local faith communities are operating within the bounds of our common life as they explore and experience liturgies celebrating and blessing same-sex unions.
6. That we commit ourselves, and call our church, in the spirit of Resolution A104 of the 70^th General Convention (1991), to continued prayer, study, and discernment on the pastoral care for gay and lesbian persons, to include the compilation and development by a special commission organized and appointed by the Presiding Bishop of resources to facilitate as wide a conversation of discernment as possible throughout the church.
7. That our baptism into Jesus Christ is inseparable from our communion with one another, and we commit ourselves to that communion despite our diversity of opinion and, among dioceses, a diversity of pastoral practice with the gay men and lesbians among us.
8. That it is a matter of faith that our Lord longs for our unity as his disciples, and for us this entails living within the boundaries of the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church. We believe this discipline expresses faithfulness to our polity and that it will facilitate the conversation we seek not only in The Episcopal Church, but also in the wider Anglican Communion and beyond.

What does this resolution accomplish?

• It recognizes what we believe is one of the most distinctive features of Anglicanism: the ability to maintain unity without requiring uniformity. We are convinced that this resolution offers a way forward in the best spirit of Anglican comprehensiveness: recognizing that rites for blessing are and will be used by those who choose to offer them in response the pastoral needs of their constituency and providing room for theological consensus to emerge out of liturgical practice.
• We believe that the fuller inclusion of all the baptized into the Body of Christ is not an issue which will split the church but an opportunity which will move the church forward in mission and ministry – if we will claim it and proclaim it.
• We believe it is an opportunity for evangelism which will breathe new life into our work and our witness to those yearning to hear an alternative to the strident voices of the religious right who have for too long presumed to speak to the culture as representing Christian Values. We have Good News to tell and it’s time to get on with the business of telling it.

• No one is or will be compelled to bless same-sex unions in this church, but the church must also respect the theological judgment of those who wish to bless these relationships by providing such rites for the use of the church.
• It is true that many view this issue as fundamentally about the authority of Scripture, and therefore, central. At most, however, it is about the interpretation of Scripture, and if how we interpret Scripture is to split us apart, we are in for splitting on a whole host of issues.

· The larger question is whether or not this issue is so central to our common faith so as to split us apart. The answer is “no” according to the 2003 House of Bishops’ Theology Committee Report: [5.3] “We believe that disunity over issues of human sexuality in general, and homosexuality in particular, needs to be taken seriously by all members of the Church. And diverse opinion needs to be respected. But we do not believe these should be Church-dividing issues.”

What message is the Episcopal Church sending about sexual morality and traditional family values?

• The message we are sending about traditional family values is that those are the values that emerge from significant, committed human relationships, including, but not limited to, marriage.
• The message we are sending about sexual morality is that the expectations of fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and holy love are the same for all Christians … gay or straight, bisexual or transgender.

Where’s “the theology?” What exactly does it mean for the church to give its blessing? (From the Claiming the Blessing Theology Statement, 2003)

“Blessing” is perhaps the most controversial word in the Church’s consideration of the treatment of same sex households in its midst. Because of this fact, we must take great care to be precise about what we mean when we use the word. The following are the building blocks for a theology of blessing: Creation, Covenant, Grace, and Sacrament.

Creation itself is the fundamental act of blessing. Creation is a blessing (gift) to humankind from God and humankind blesses (gives thanks to or praises) God in return. The Hebrew word for “blessing,” barak, means at its core the awesome power of life itself. A fundamental claim of the Bible in regards to creation is that there is enough, in fact an abundance, of creation, and therefore of blessing, to go around.

“Blessing” is a covenantal, relational word. It describes the results of the hallowed, right, just relationship between God and humankind. Blessing is what happens when God and humankind live in covenant. It is important to remember here that the relationships between human beings and the relationship between God and human beings cannot be separated. “Blessing” and “justice” are inseparable biblical concepts.

When we ask for God’s blessing, we are asking for God’s presence and favor. In Christian terms this favor is what we call “grace,” God’s disposition toward us that is not dependent upon our merit, but is a sure and certain gift to the believer in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

In our tradition, the Sacraments are the primary ways the grace/blessing of God is communicated to us (“a sure and certain means,” BCP, p. 857). The two “great” Sacraments “given by Christ” (BCP, p. 858) are Baptism and Eucharist. In them we see the two fundamental aspects of blessing: the blessing of life from God and the blessing of God for that life.

Five other rites are traditionally known as sacraments, but they are dependent for their meaning on the two Sacraments and are not “necessary for all persons.” A whole host of other actions in the life of the Church, and of individual Christians, are “sacramental” in nature, i.e., they mediate the grace/blessing of God and cause us to give thanks and praise/blessing to God.

In our tradition, priests and bishops have the authority to pronounce God’s blessing within the community of faith. They do so not by their own power, but as instruments of the grace (blessing) of God within the Church. Their authority to bless, too, finds its meaning in the two great Sacraments.

When the Church chooses “to bless” something it is declaring that this particular person or persons or thing is a gift/blessing from God and his/her/its/their purpose is to live in (or, the case of things, to assist in) covenanted relationship with God (and with all creation), i.e., to bless God in return.

To bless the relationship between two men or two women is to do this very thing: to declare that this relationship is a blessing from God and that its purpose is to bless God, both within the context of the community of faith. If the Church believes that same-sex relationships show forth God’s blessing when they are lived in fidelity, mutuality, and unconditional love, then this blessing must be owned and celebrated and supported in the community of faith.

=========================

Clearing up some questions:

Just what are we blessing when we bless a same-sex relationship?

We are blessing the persons in relationship to one another and the world in which they live. We are blessing the ongoing promise of fidelity and mutuality. We are neither blessing orientation or “lifestyle,” nor blessing particular sexual behaviors. “Orientation” and “lifestyle” are theoretical constructs that cannot possibly be descriptive of any couples’ commitment to one another. And every couple works out their own sexual behaviors that sustain and enhance their commitment. We don’t prescribe that behavior, whether the couple is heterosexual or homosexual, except to say that it must be within the context of mutuality and fidelity.

Isn’t marriage and same-sex blessing the same thing?

That they are similar is obvious, as is taking monastic vows, i.e., blessing a vocation to (among other things) celibacy. Each (marriage, blessing unions, monastic vows) grounds a relationship that includes sexual expression in public covenant which gives them “a reality not dependent on the contingent thoughts and feelings of the people involved” and “a certain freedom to ‘take time’ to mature and become as profoundly nurturing as they can” (Rowan Williams, “The Body’s Grace,” p. 63). The question remains as to whether “marriage” is appropriately defined as the covenant relationship between a man and a woman only, as is the Church’s long tradition. The Church must continue to wrestle with this issue. To wait until it is solved, however, in order to celebrate the blessing of a faithful same-sex relationship is pastorally irresponsible and theologically unnecessary.

Is same-sex blessing a sacrament?

We can say it is sacramental. Strictly speaking in our tradition there are only two Sacraments (Baptism and Eucharist). Five other rites are commonly referred to as sacraments because of the Church’s long experience of them. But in a sacramental understanding of creation, everything in creation has the potential to be sacramental—to mediate the presence/blessing of God. Priests and bishops “pronounce” blessing on those things the community lifts up as showing forth this blessing. The New Testament word for “blessing” is eulogein, literally “to speak well of.”

Sources

Eric B. Beresford, answer to “What would it mean for the Church to Bless Same-sex Unions?” (portions), Commission on Faith and Doctrine, Dialogue on Same-sex Unions, Anglican Diocese of New Westminster, pp. 13-190.

Walter Brueggemann, “The Liturgy of Abundance, the Myth of Scarcity,” in Deep Memory Exuberant Hope: Contested Truth in a Post-Christian World, (Fortress, 2000), pp. 69-75.

William L. Crockett, answer to “What would it mean for the Church to Bless Same-sex Unions?” (portions), Commission on Faith and Doctrine, Dialogue on Same-sex Unions, Anglican Diocese of New Westminster, pp. 20-21.

Leonel Mitchell, “”Baruk Attah, Adonai Blessing,” in “Theological Aspects of Committed Relationships of Same-sex Couples: Report of the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music . . . for Discussion at the 73rd General Convention Meeting in Denver in 2000,” The Blue Book (Church Publishing, 2000), pp. 225-227.

Catherine M. Wallace, For Fidelity: How Intimacy and Commitment Enrich Our Lives (Vintage Books, 1999), especially chapter four.

Rowan Williams, “The Body’s Grace,” in Ourselves, Our Souls and Bodies: Sexuality and the Household of God, ed. Charles Hefling (Boston: Cowley, 1996), pp. 58-68.

PB Responds to Lambeth Boycott

Five Anglican Primates, according to ENS, four from Africa and one from South America, have publicized their intentions to boycott the 2008 Lambeth Conference in a letter responding to a group of English bishops who had urged them to attend the once-a-decade gathering.

Archbishops Peter Akinola of Nigeria, Emmanuel Kolini of Rwanda, Benjamin Nzimbi of Kenya, Henry Orombi of Uganda, and Gregory Venables of the Southern Cone -- who make up five of the 38 Anglican Primates -- told the 21 English bishops that they would not attend Lambeth in protest to the invitations extended by the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Episcopal Church's bishops. Akinola, Kolini and Orombi had all previously announced that they intended to boycott the conference.

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori is saddened by the primates' decision not to attend Lambeth and responds,

"The gathering will be diminished by their absence, and I imagine that they themselves will miss a gift they might have otherwise received," the Presiding Bishop said. "None of us is called to 'feel at home' except in the full and immediate presence of God. It is our searching, especially with those we find most 'other,' that is likely to lead us into the fuller experience of the body of Christ. Fear of the other is an invitation to seek the face of God, not a threat to be avoided."

Diocese of VA, 'Generous and Faithful'

In a seven page report, a commission in the Diocese of VA formed “to discern a possible ‘emerging consensus’ regarding the permitting of ‘local options’ for the blessing of same-sex unions,” came to the following conclusion:

Part II: Recommendation as to Finding a Way Forward We, the members of the R-5 Commission, being mindful of our membership in the Anglican Communion, recommend that the 213th Annual Council of the Diocese of Virginia, building on the process of continued listening and discernment of a possible “emerging consensus” with regard to the permitting of “local option” for the blessing of same-gender unions, appoint a new commission to identify the practical steps necessary to provide for the pastoral care and spiritual support of same-gender couples in committed monogamous relationships.

We specifically recommend that:

1) An appointed Commission compile and make available theological, catechetical, and liturgical resources within the Episcopal Church and the wider Anglican Communion for the pastoral care and spiritual support of same-gender couples in committed relationships; and Report of the R-5 Commission to the 213th Annual Council of the Diocese of Virginia

2) The Commission design and execute four town hall meetings, in order to share resources for education and to establish a better sense of an “emerging consensus” pertaining to “local option” for the blessing of same-gender unions ; and

3) The Commission be tasked to make a report of its findings and work to the 214th Annual Council, in time for further action to be taken in anticipation of the 76th General Convention of the Episcopal Church in 2009. This recommendation seeks to provide an ongoing commitment to discern ways of being generous and faithful in our common pastoral call, even as we acknowledge that we are not of one mind in this Diocese on the permissibility of “local option” in the blessing of samegender unions.

To view the complete Report click this link and scroll down to 'Reports: R-5 Commission Report

Resolution from the Diocese of NC

ON THE INCLUSION OF ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS FULL AND EQUAL PARTICIPANTS IN THE LIFE OF CHRIST'S CHURCH.

Resolved by the 192nd Annual Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina, that the Diocese continue to demonstrate its commitment to radical hospitality and, that in accordance with the House of Bishops' Statement, Fall 2007, we "proclaim the Gospel that in Christ all God's children, including gay and lesbian persons, are full and equal participants in the life of Christ's Church" by:

1) Urging the Archbishop of Canterbury to extend to the duly elected and consecrated Bishop of New Hampshire an invitation to full participation in the Lambeth Conference of 2008;

2) Encouraging our Deputies to the 2009 General Convention to ensure compliance with Title III. Canon I. Section 2, which supports the full and equal participation of all persons regardless of sexual orientation in all aspects of the Church's ministries, lay and ordained;

3) Encouraging the General Convention to call for the development of public liturgies for the blessing of same sex unions.

======

The debate on the resolution by convention, which was abbreviated because of the threat of winter weather, was civil and respectful, in the Spirit of Jesus, as Bishop Curry observed after the vote.

Episcopal Leader Defends Gay Bishops

LONDON (AP) — Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori says her church has been unfairly singled out for criticism because it is honest about consecrating gay bishops.

Jefferts Schori told BBC Radio 4's "PM" program that the New York-based church, which is the Anglican body in the U.S., is far from the only Anglican province that has a bishop with a same-sex partner. In 2003, Episcopalians elected the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire, causing an uproar that has pushed the Anglican family toward a split.

"He is certainly not alone in being a gay bishop; he's certainly not alone in being a gay partnered bishop," Jefferts Schori said in an interview broadcast Tuesday. "He is alone in being the only gay partnered bishop who's open about that status."

The 77 million-member Anglican Communion is a global fellowship of churches that trace their roots to the Church of England. Most Anglicans are traditionalists who believe Scripture bars gay relationships. Liberal-leaning Anglicans believe the Bible's social justice teachings on acceptance should apply to same-gender couples.

The national Episcopal Church has not developed an official public prayer to bless gay couples churchwide. However, Jefferts Schori and other Episcopal leaders acknowledge that such ceremonies take place in many parishes. She said other Anglican churches do the same.

"Those services are happening in various places, including in the Church of England, where my understanding is that there are far more of them happening than there are in the Episcopal Church," Jefferts Schori said.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.